Phantsi Isijapanese Arbitration Act, elamiselwa ngokusekelwe UNCITRAL Imodeli Umthetho kwi-Ngamazwe Abarhwebayo Arbitration ngowama, amaqela babe ifayile uxwebhu lwezikhalazo kunye inkundla ucela inkundla ukuba bucala i-arbitral kweelwimi ezithile phantsi kweemeko ezithileKwiindawo ezinjalo uxwebhu lwezikhalazo, amaqela imibuzo banga ubunyani, phakathi kwezinye izinto, ukuba"imiqathango ye-arbitral kweelwimi violated uluntu umgaqo-nkqubo Japan"phantsi Inqaku ye-Arbitration Umthetho okanye ukuba"eyakhiwe ngayo arbitral abachopheli-matyala okanye arbitration proceeding violated Isijapanese nemithetho nemiqathango"phantsi Inqaku ye-Arbitration Umthetho, njengoko emidlalo kuba sicwangciso bucala arbitral kweelwimi. Kutshanje, Tokyo ephakamileyo olukhankanywe ukwakhiwa Inqaku kwaye Inqaku kwi meko apho Inkampani X (i-appellant) ezenziwe sesi sibini uxwebhu lwezikhalazo kunye inkundla kwi-Japan, ucela inkundla ukuba bucala i-arbitral kweelwimi ukuba waba rendered ngokungqinelana nomgaqo-imithetho Japan Abarhwebayo Arbitration Association (JCAA) (Inkampani X v Inkampani Y, Tokyo ephakamileyo, (RA), agasti). Kule meko, arbitral isigqeba rendered i-arbitral kweelwimi ordering X ukuhlawula Inkampani Y (i-appellee) isixa esithile imali kuba, phakathi kwezinye, ukuhlawulwa umonakalo lwayo oluvela X ke breach yayo zomgaqo-phantsi umsasazi isivumelwano phakathi X kwaye Y. X ezenziwe sesi sibini i-aforementioned uxwebhu lwezikhalazo, asserting ukuba arbitral isigqeba ke ukwakhiwa kwamaziko umsasazi isivumelwano violated i-EU wokhuphiswano kwaye ke ngoko violated uluntu umgaqo-nkqubo Japan kwaye i-arbitral isigqeba ke ukwakhiwa kwamaziko mthwalo ka-ubungqina akazange ilungelelaniswe phantsi Isijapanese umthetho, elawula umthetho umsasazi kwesi sivumelwano, kwaye ke ngoko arbitration proceeding violated Isijapanese umthetho. Nangona kunjalo, Tokyo Wesithili Inkundla rendered isigqibo dismissing X ke uxwebhu lwezikhalazo kwaye, kuphendulwa isibheno ngokuchasene eso sigqibo ezenziwe sesi sibini ngu 'X', Tokyo ephakamileyo rendered isigqibo enz isigqibo Tokyo Wesithili Inkundla. Kubalulekile kananjalo ngokufanayo kuba abanjalo amaqela ukuba argue ukuba"arbitration proceeding waba kwi-breach ka-Isijapanese nemithetho nemiqathango."Kwezinyanga zilishumi elinesihlanu leminyaka ukususela Arbitration Umthetho yaqalisa umkhosi, Isijapanese iinkundla kufuneka kokuba amathuba ukumelana lo mba malunga ntoni kangakanani le aforementioned emidlalo kufuneka yamkelwe kwi isigqibo nokuba bucala arbitral mbasa. Isijapanese arbitration practitioners zithe ngokusondeleleneyo esweni i inkundla ke ukwakhiwa ngalo mba ukusukela izakuba abonisa ntoni kangakanani arbitral mbasa basenokuba bucala yi-Isijapanese iinkundla, apho ingaba seriously yenza lo mba njengoko na okanye hayi Japan sibonwa njengoko i -"arbitration-eyobuhlobo"kolawulo lwesixeko ehlabathini.
Thina envisage ukuba Tokyo ephakamileyo isigqibo reasonably affirmed wesithili inkundla isigqibo esekelwe kwi imboniselo ukuba asingabo bonke breaches a elawula umthetho okanye inkqubo esisinyanzelo imithetho nge-i-arbitral isigqeba eyiyo"- wonke-nkqubo"emidlalo kuba kwinkundla bucala i-arbitral kweelwimi phantsi Arbitration Mthetho.
Ngaphezulu, ingakumbi, Tokyo ephakamileyo wathabatha isikhundla ukuba EU wokhuphiswano akufunekanga eyiyo uluntu umgaqo-nkqubo Japan kwaye arbitral isigqeba ke mere misconstruction a umsasazi isivumelwano kwi-ukwaphulwa komthetho inkqubo esisinyanzelo imithetho avume necessarily eyiyo a breach loluntu umgaqo-nkqubo Japan phantsi Inqaku ye-Arbitration Mthetho. Ngaphaya koko, sikholelwa ukuba kubalulekile kuba kwinkundla reasonably umda i isisango"imiba malunga arbitration proceeding"ukuze uphephe imeko apho amaqela unako afumaneka ngokuzenzekela kwenza umzamo yandisa umda ezinjalo imiba ukwenza lula bucala arbitral mbasa ngokusekelwe emhlabeni ukuba arbitration proceeding violated Isijapanese nemithetho nemiqathango phantsi Inqaku ye-Arbitration Mthetho. Esikhoyo kunjalo, ngeli kwaba lixoxiwe yi-amaqela na okanye hayi ukwakhiwa kwamaziko mthwalo ka-ubungqina bokuba ufumana i-mba ka-arbitration proceeding, Tokyo ephakamileyo reasonably ndagqiba ukuba umcimbi of substantive umthetho ke ngoko arbitral isigqeba ke misconstruction ye-mthwalo ka-ubungqina akuthethi ukuba arbitration proceeding violated Isijapanese imithetho.
Kwi-Japan, inani amaxwebhu ezikhalazo asiwa bucala arbitral mbasa ezenziwe sesi sibini kunye inkundla ufumana i-small kwaye nkqu enye inkundla isigqibo ngalo mba ingaba significantly kuchaphazela umsebenzi we-Arbitration Umthetho kwaye arbitration amanqaku kwi-Japan.
Ukususela ukuba imbono, i-Tokyo ephakamileyo isigqibo langoku meko lenze kubalulekile igalelo kwi-solidifying a amanyathelo afanelekileyo ukwakhiwa kwamaziko inkcazelo"- wonke-nkqubo"ngokunjalo njengoko umda we"imiba malunga arbitration proceeding"ngokunxulumene emidlalo kuba sicwangciso bucala arbitral mbasa phantsi Arbitration Umthetho kwaye ngaloo ndlela ukuseka sophisticated arbitration amanqaku kwi-Japan. Thina yavakalisa bakholelwa ukuba uthotho enjalo izigqibo rendered yi-Isijapanese iinkundla uza yomeleza ngakumbi Japan ke indawo njengoko i-arbitration-eyobuhlobo kolawulo lwesixeko kwaye kulindeleke ukuba ukutsala yehlabathi lwamashishini karhulumente ukukhetha Japan njengoko situs ka-arbitration kwi-arbitration izivumelwano zabo ngamazwe ishishini eyenziweyo. Ukuba uqinisekise ukuba musa unobuhle ngaphandle ngomhla rhoqo uhlaziyo ukususela Kluwer Arbitration Hetalia, nceda zibophelele apha.
